ASPECTS OF THE NAME DISPUTE BETWEEN MACEDONIA AND GREECE: SYMBOLS, CONFLICT AND ECONOMIC COSTS
Abstract
The Republic of Macedonia and Greece have a symbolic dispute that lasts for almost three decades. In the cen-tre of the dispute is the term “Macedonia†that Greece claims to be exclusively Greek, at the same time deny-ing the right of the neighbouring country to freely use the name. The paper examines several aspects of the dis-pute. By utilizing the theoretical framework given by the ethnosymbolic school of nationalism (predominantly Smith and Hutchinson), it explains the theoretical aspects of symbols and their use in nation building process-es. Furthermore, it examines the conflict itself and its background, trying to establish the precise kind of sym-bolic conflict it belongs to, and the possible outcomes given the asymmetric power relation between the two actors. Finally, it analyses the costs of the economic embargo imposed to the Republic of Macedonia by Greece, as a direct consequence of the symbolic dispute between the two countries.References
Agnew, J. (2006). “No Borders, No Nations: Making Greece in Macedoniaâ€. Annals of the American Geographers, 97(2), 398-422.
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities. Verso, London/New York.
Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. Little, Brown and Company, Boston.
Billig, M. (1995). Banal Nationalism. Sage Publications, London.
Carr, L.C. and Landa, T.L. (1983). “The Economics of Symbols, Clan Names and Religionâ€. The Journal of Legal Studies, 12, 135-156.
Cerulo, A.K. (1989). “Sociopolitical Control and the Structure of National Symbols: An Empirical Analysis of National Anthemsâ€, Social Forces 68(1). 76-99.
Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia. at https://www.sobranie.mk/the-constitution-of-the-republic-of-macedonia.nspx (accessed 19 December 2017).
Engstrom, J. (2011). “The Power of Perception: The Impact of the Macedonian Question on Inter-ethnic Relations in the Republic of Macedoniaâ€. The Global Review on Ethnopolitics, 3(1). 3-17.
Floudas, D. A. (2002). “Pardon: A Conflict for a Name – FYROM’s Dispute With Greece Revisitedâ€. at http://www.mace-donianhistory.org/research--documents/pardon-a-conflict-for-a-name-fyroms-dispute-with-greece-revisited. (accessed 19 December 2017).
Gans, H.J. (1979). “Symbolic ethnicity: The Future of Ethnic Groups and Cultures in Americaâ€, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2(1), 1-20.
Harrison, S. (1995). “Four Types of Symbolic Conflictâ€, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2(1), 255-272.
Hutchinson, J. (2003). “The Past, Present, and the Future of the Nation-Stateâ€, Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 4, 5-12.
Ichijo, A. and Uzelac, G (eds.). (2005). When is the Nation – Towards an Undestanding of theories of Nationalism.
Routledge, Abingdon/New York.
IDSCS. (2009). Flawed Arguments and Omitted Truths: a Commentary of the “ELIAMEP Thesis†on the “Name Issueâ€. Institute for Democracy “Societas Civilis†– Skopje, Skopje. at http://idscs.org.mk/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/flawed_arguments_and_omitted_truths.pdf (accessed 19 December 2017).
International Crisis Group. (2009). “Macedonia’s Name: Breaking the Deadlockâ€. Europe Briefing N.52, at https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/95305/b52_macedonias_name.pdf. (accessed 19 December 2017).
Ivanovski, H. (2013). “The Macedonia – Greece Dispute/Difference over the Name Issue: Mitigating the Inherently Insolvableâ€. New Balkan Politics, 14. 48-80.
Kofos, E. (2009). The Current Macedonian Issue between Athens and Skopje: is there an Option for a Breakthrough?, ELIAMEP, Athens. at https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/102334/eliamep-thesis-3_2009-kofos.pdf (accessed 17 December 2017).
Kolst, P. (2006). “National Symbols as Signs of Unity and Divisionâ€, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 29(4), 676-701.
Law on the Flag of the Republic of Macedonia. (1995). Official Gazette no.47/95 (6.10.1995).
Lawler. E et al. (1988). “Coercive Capability in Conflict: A Test of Bilateral Deterrence Versus Conflict Spiral Theoryâ€, Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 93-107.
Michener H.A. et al., (1975). “Factors Affecting Concession Rate and Threat Usage in Bilateral Conflictâ€, Sociometry, 38(1), 62-80.
Nikolov M. (2013). “The measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization: The case of Macedoniaâ€, PhD; Faculty of economics, University of Ljubljana.
Özkirimli, U. (2010). Theories of Nationalism (second edition). Palgrave MacMIllan, London.
Seraphinofff, M. (2007). “Dimensions of the Greek-Macedonian Name Dispute†.at http://www.macedonianlit.com/pdfs/personal/Dimensions%20of%20the%20Dispute.pdf (accessed 17 December 2017).
Smith, A. (1994). “Ethnic Nationalism and the Plight of Minoritiesâ€, Journal of Refugee Studies, 7 (2/3). 186-198.
Smith, A.D. (1989). “The Origins of Nationsâ€, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 12(3), 349-356.
Vangeli, A. (2011). “Nation-building Ancient Macedonian Style: the Origins and the Effects of the So-called Antiquization in Macedoniaâ€, Nationalities Papers, 39, 13-32.
Wimmer, A. (2008). “The Making and Unmaking of Ethnic Boundaries: A Multilevel Process Theoryâ€. American Journal of Sociology, 113(4), 970-1022.
World Bank. (1993). The costs and benefits of Slovenian independence. World Bank Working Papers WPS 1126.
Retrieved December 23, 2017, from http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/1993/04/01/000009265_3961004121321/Render ed/PDF/multi0page.pdf.
Zalduendo, J. (2003). Enterprise restructuring and transition: Evidence from Macedonia. IMF Working Paper No. 03/136.
Retrieved May 23, 2009, from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2003/wp03136.pdf.
