IMPORTANCE OF THE MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS AND EMPLOYEES

  • Ljupco Eftimov Faculty of Economics, Ss.Cyril and Methodius
  • Andrijana Ristovska Faculty of Economics, Ss.Cyril and Methodius
Keywords: workforce motivation, theories of motivation, motivational factors, work performance, students, employees

Abstract

The degree of the workforce motivation is crucial for organizations in achieving organizational goals. But what are the most important factors that motivate employees? In this respect, compared with the theoretical postulates of the theories of motivation, this paper conducted a survey designed to determine the motivational factors that the students of the last academic year of study as future employees have recognized as influential for better work performance and to assess whether the factors change by changing the environment and the employment status by determining the motivational factors that improve the work performance recognized by the current employees with different demographic characteristics.

References

Greenberg et.al. (2003). Behavior in Organizations. Prentice Hall, Vol. 8, pp.188-215. Grant (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1): 108–124. Kosfeld and Neckermann (2011). Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3(3): 86–99. Markham et. al. (2002). Recognizing good attendance: A longitudinal, quasi-experimental field study. Personnel Psychology 55(3): 639–60. Maslow (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Originally Published in Psychological Review, 50, 370-396. Adams, J.S. (1963). Toward an understanding of equity, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 67, pp. 422ϕ36. Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational behavior and human performance, 4(2), 142-175. Skinner, B.F. (1938). The Behavior of Organisms, AppletonϕCenturyϕCrofts, New York, NY. Goodman P.S. & Friedman A. (1971). An examination of Adams’ theory of inequity. Administrative Science Quarterly.Vol.16, No. 3 (Sep., 1971), pp. 271-288. Retrieved July 28, 2016, from: http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1860&context=tepper McGregor, D.M. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw – Hill. W.G. Bennis, E.H. Schein, & C. McGregor (Eds.). (1966). Leadership and motivation: Essays of Douglas McGregor (pp.3-20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. International Labor Organization (2007).Decent Working Time, Balancing Workers; Needs with Business requirements.

Published
2017-01-05